This post is based on last week’s Sweet
vine, bitter berries.
What would I do if I were Urmila? I asked
myself this question several times. Every time I came up with the same answer.
I would do exactly as she did until the doctor said, “Now you’re in my hands.”
We know nothing about the background of
either the doctor or of Urmila other than the bare facts in the story. What is
obvious is that she wasn’t looking out for any sexual adventure. If she was,
the doctor wouldn’t be drugging her and making her do things she wouldn’t when
conscious.
As one of the readers says, this is a story
of deception. But deception is the finest form of persuasion. The problem is
with the objectives. The techniques are the same. It’s worth identifying them
so that we can adopt them for ethically acceptable objectives.
I see two faces of the doctor. He is a great
persuader until Urmila takes the juice at his accomplice’s place. From that
moment on he is a beastly criminal. He uses coercion including blackmailing,
not persuasion or seduction, to make Urmila do his bidding. It is despicable to
shoot a deer in a cage. And I hope the law catches up with him in spite of his
obvious influence in high places including the judiciary.
What we will examine is why Urmila so readily
accepted his offers and suggestions. Why was he so persuasive? The simple
answer is that he earned her complete trust. As Aristotle says, of all the
persuasion factors, the persuader’s credibility is the most important one. This
is because once we trust someone, they can persuade us to do virtually anything.
Our conscious mind, which is rational and critical, happily steps back and
relaxes once it is reassured by trust.
Life would be terrible if we suspected that
everyone around us was out to cheat us or take advantage of us. We want to
trust people around us because that is when we feel at home.
What are the factors that helped the doctor
get Urmila’s complete trust? He was a prominent doctor working for the Chief
Justice. He belonged to her cast and
village. But more than anything else, he was not in a hurry in a way that would
alert her antennae. He met her occasionally, and offered her a ride home
occasionally. It is almost as if he was not going out of his way but just being
nice to a person from his circle. I assume that he avoided any kind of sexual
innuendos when he talked to her.
On its own, none of these factors would
create total trust. But when they came together they were deadly. If I were
Urmila I wouldn’t sense any danger whatsoever because he built up his
credibility bit by bit over a few weeks.
What do we learn from this? We are often not
persuasive because we don’t build up our credibility. We don’t do enough to
earn the trust of people around us, especially subordinates, through our actions
over time. We delude ourselves into thinking that we are credible and rely too heavily
on the power of the position we hold.
No comments:
Post a Comment